It’s the symbol to the left of the URL > Show Certificate. They even make it available on iOS Safari (Page Info > Connection Security Details), but if it’s expired, you’ll know by the big red warning page.

I don't have that :-) — what I see when I click the thingamajig on the left side of the URL is a menu with "Hide Distracting Items", "Zoom", "Find" and "Website settings".

For me it’s hidden behind a kebab menu in that thingamajig you described.

Well, either it isn't there in my Safari (macOS 15.7.2) or I can't find it.

I have found "Connection Security Details…" in the "Safari" menu, though. But my point still stands: average users won't see any certificate information without serious effort.

Ah no, i am on iOS 26.

Not quite - while you can reduce oxygen levels, they have to be kept within 4pp so at worst, will make you light headed. Many athletes train at the same levels though so it’s easy to overcome.

That'd make for a decent heist comedy - a bunch of former professional athletes get hired to break in to a low-oxygen data center, but the plan goes wrong and they have to use their sports skills in improbable ways to pull it off.

Gartner claims 25% of the Fortune 500 are currently working to move back to on-prem for the majority of their applications. It’s not sexy so doesn’t appear in tech news as much but it’s happening

I’ve worked in a lot of enterprises on “tiny projects” but never on something that only went to 5 users. In one role I was the sole maintainer of a “small internal tool”…that had 1,000 daily users logging 5 hours/day each.

How much effort was spent automating this to fix 112 instances across Uber’s code base? I assume code reviews would catch any new issues so this seems like overkill for a small one-off task?

Epic is used extensively in the UK, Europe and Australia so to say it’s a regional thing seems odd? They’re speculated to be one of the largest privately held companies in the world.

There’s a whole concept of records management in enterprises that manages the disposal of data. It’s far more complex than just purge dates as there’s often regulatory requirements and legal discovery issues so <2% of data is actually disposed due to perceived risk.

For personal data, the concept would be simpler but still has requirements like say tax records need to be kept 7 years.

Maybe park the data with the regulator as leaving it in your hands longer than you need it is asking for trouble.

They didn’t want to make a breaking change but didn’t:

1. Use UUIDv7, which has the same sortability without breaking the ID format, or

2. Repackage the ULIDs to maintain consistency

And then broke pagination with this change?

How was this ever approved by a change control board? Or do they not have one?

From just reading the README, the example is not valid JSON. Is that intentional?

Otherwise it seems like a prompt building tool, or am I missing something here?

Thanks for pointing this out. This was an error on my part.

I see someone opened an issue for it so will fix now.

Oof you’re right LOL

There’s so many countries this could be: Australia, USA, UK, Italy, Estonia.. it’s almost a national pass time