Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | felixgallo's commentslogin

This is total 'both sides do it' nonsense.

Doubtless Hunter Biden's job was a naked nepo quasi-bribery thing, and he said and did all sorts of ridiculous things. Dude is indefensible.

But on one hand you have a president joining a conference call and not discussing business, and on the other hand you have a president literally demanding tribute, gold bars, a ballroom, firing all available oversight, blackmailing all of the universities to toe his ideological line, installing crypto and antivax scammers, and looting like it's going out of style, and meanwhile all of his kids are becoming millionaires trading openly off the name and the power.

"Barron’s first major business move came in 2024, when he co-founded World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency venture launched with his father and older brothers. He is even credited inside the family with explaining basic crypto concepts to his father. After Trump won the presidency, the company exploded in value. Forbes estimates it added more than $1.5 billion to Trump family wealth—about 10% of which belongs to Barron." (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/net-wort...)


Given your statements about Hunter, I believe you have decent visibility into both sides of the issue. Kudos to you.

I don’t disbelieve what you say about Trump and his family. I am certain they are cashing in on his time in office, at a tremendous pace. ( It has to be worth it, given the damage being done to the Trump corporate brand. )


You're absolutely right, and it's frankly disgusting to see feckless traitors on this website pretending like Trump is somehow excusable in any way.


I’d like your opinion on something. What do you make of these allegations?

1) Romania: On September 28, 2015, Vice President Biden welcomed Romanian President Klaus Iohannis to the White House. Within five weeks of this meeting, a Romanian businessman involved with a high-profile corruption prosecution in Romania, Gabriel Popoviciu, began depositing a Biden associate’s bank account, which ultimately made their way into Biden family accounts. Popoviciu made sixteen of the seventeen payments, totaling over $3 million, to the Biden associate account while Joe Biden was Vice President. Biden family accounts ultimately received approximately $1.038 million. The total amount from Romania to the Biden family and their associates is over $3 million.

2) China- CEFC: On March 1, 2017—less than two months after Vice President Joe Biden left public office—State Energy HK Limited, a Chinese company, wired $3 million to a Biden associate’s account. This is the same bank account used in the above “Romania” section. After the Chinese company wired the Biden associate account the $3 million, the Biden family received approximately $1,065,692 over a three-month period in different bank accounts. Additionally, the CEFC Chairman gives Hunter Biden a diamond worth $80,000. Lastly, CEFC creates a joint venture with the Bidens in the summer of 2017. The timeline lays out the “WhatsApp” messages and subsequent wires from the Chinese to the Bidens of $100,000 and $5 million. The total amount from China, specifically with CEFC and their related entities, to the Biden family and their associates is over $8 million.

3) Kazakhstan: On April 22, 2014, Kenes Rakishev, a Kazakhstani oligarch used his Singaporean entity, Novatus Holdings, to wire one of Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca entities $142,300. The very next day—April 23, 2014—the Rosemont Seneca entity transferred the exact same amount of money to a car dealership for a car for Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden and Devon Archer would represent Burisma in Kazakhstan in May/June of 2014 as the company attempted to broker a three-way deal among Burisma, the Kazakhstan government, and a Chinese state-owned energy company.

4) Ukraine: Devon Archer joined the Burisma board of directors in spring of 2014 and was joined by Hunter Biden shortly thereafter. Hunter Biden joined the company as counsel, but after a meeting with Burisma owner Mykola Zlochevsky in Lake Como, Italy, was elevated to the board of directors in the spring of 2014. Both Biden and Archer were each paid $1 million per year ( note: I am quoting a source here. I’ve always seen this number at 500k, not 1M ) for their positions on the board of directors. In December 2015, after a Burisma board of directors meeting, Zlochevsky and Hunter Biden “called D.C.” in the wake of mounting pressures the company was facing. Zlochevsky was later charged with bribing Ukrainian officials with $6 million in an attempt to delay or drop the investigation into his company. The total amount from Ukraine to the Biden family and their associates is $6.5 million.

Are people that ignore these ‘feckless traitors’? Why or why not?


Why do you think that I'm going to defend Biden? Politics are not sports, and I don't have a "favorite team". Your silly gotcha questions won't work on me because I don't reflexively defend people just because they are supported by corrupt political organizations.

Two wrongs don't make a right, and one person's crimes do not excuse another's. Arrest them all.

We need fundamental changes in our political system, and we're not going to be able to achieve anything if you keep pretending like these whataboutisms are worth anyone's time. Wake up.


Great. If you see Bidens defenders as ‘feckless traitors’ as well as Trumps, then I see no fault in your judgement of what’s criminal and what’s not.

I just couldn’t pick that up from what you’d written. I thought you were calling one side traitors and not the other.


Rick, do you feel like there's an extreme asymmetry in scope, scale, intent, and result between the two sides?


I think there is a rising slope.

Obama was a bit dirty with things like Solyandra, but this was not huge.

Trump 1 was not as openly money grubbing, but I would guess more corrupt than Obama. Nothing specific comes to mind, though.

Biden was worse than Trump 1. The Ukrainian gas job, the business introductions, Hunters anonymous art sales, etc were next level stuff.

Trump 2 seems pretty much off the leash. He seems unrestrained on many fronts.

Looking back at history, we had scandals like the Teapot dome scandal, then things got better again. So maybe it’s cyclical.


Whatever product manager team decided to jump into React Native with both feet for the Windows experience needs to be ejected from the industry permanently. Think of how many thousands of human hours per day are now spent waiting on React Native jank, all in order to save the Windows developers from having to program in Windows using Microsoft products.


Most likely saving Windows developers from learning programming. They are just javascript monkeys because that is what Microsoft is hiring these days and you can't trust monkeys with native C++. The thing would leak memory and explode immediately if those idiots tried to write native code. So in the name of hiring cheap idiots that can't program we all have to put up with this slow, bloated garbage.

There is no universe in which I should see lag between a click and a menu appearing in File explorer, taskbar or anywhere in the OS. Not on a machine with 8 idling cores.


> So in the name of hiring cheap idiots that can't program we all have to put up with this slow, bloated garbage.

Irony is they're not cheap hires, either.


MS could/should have just made other XAML/MAUI options a better experience in general over the React Native thing... It might be different if they actually embrace web as a whole and at least gave a consistent UX, more like say WebOS or ChromeOS, but that's not what they're doing here.

What MS really needs to do is create a really long checklist of all the UI defained configurations and options, along with a connected list of all the relevant API interfaces they connect to... then come up with a consistent, complete and competent component library to do a ground up re-implementation of all the things in a consistent way.

This would, of course mean stabilizing the released version of windows to mostly bug fixes for a couple years while frantically generating and dog-fooding the new UX... starting with a re-revamped task manager, and launcher/file-picker. Just a bare desktop and a hotkey that opens task manager as the first and only UI elements then working out from there.


It's a nice thought but think of the cost!

You do have to wonder what the hell the people in charge of the Windows UI are thinking. They seem to have got it so badly wrong. But so has Apple in macos.


I'm not sure the cost would be significantly worse than all the half-assed abandoned efforts so far... and it would result in the first consistent UX in Windows since Win2k.



Nobody uses statutory titles for anything to be honest; when’s the last time you referred to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act instead of “Obamacare”? When’s the last time you referred to the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program instead of “Social Security”? I’ve never heard anyone say Title XIX of the Social Security Act instead of “Medicaid,” or Title XVIII of the Social Security Act instead of “Medicare,” or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act instead of “Welfare.”


> when’s the last time you referred to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act instead of “Obamacare”

I refer to it as "the ACA", which is short and avoids an unofficial moniker first introduced as an insult.

It's not just a personal preference, it's civically important: There are still morons out there who have spent the last 15 years simultaneously gushing about how the ACA is awesome while demonizing "Obamacare."


ACA is still technically incorrect; as it’s actually statutorily the PPACA. Accuracy, am I right?


By that position we should have been using TUSoA this whole time. US is wrong. USA is wrong.America is wrong.


You're kind of proving their point: People seem to use common names (ACA, Obamacare, DoD) regardless of whether they abide by statute (PPACA) or executive meme-forcing (DoW).


There's a difference between an informal name that catches on organically and isn't politically charged, and an highly visible, ostentatiously political renaming specifically intended to make a point.


You’re telling me “Obamacare” isn’t politically charged? It was originally a political slur.


1. It's not politically charged now.

2. It's not all over government Web sites. In fact I doubt it's on them at all.

3. Cabinet-level officials aren't giving stupid speeches about how important the name is in reflecting a Whole New Approach.

4. I don't remember Obama objecting to it at the time... nor did Obama go on TV and say "It will now be called OBAMACARE in honor of me, the greatest and only competent President ever".

5. Actually I don't remember it even being a "slur". The first draft was based on Romneycare. There was also "Hillarycare", which might have actually been pejorative. In any case it wasn't anything like on the level of the President or the Secretary of anything making a bunch of noise about it.


> I don't remember Obama objecting to it at the time...

I remember that Democrats were accusing Republicans of violating the Hatch Act by using their official congressional mailers to say "Obamacare".


> It's not all over government Web sites. In fact I doubt it's on them at all.

I can’t find reference to “Obamacare” but there is one for TrumpRx: https://trumprx.gov/


I say ACA, Obamacare is politically charged. And the cases you've mentioned all shorten a long name into a colloquial name. This is not the case for Department of War/Defense.

That said, let's call it what it is... it's a war machine. Just as we should refer to Israeli Occupation Forces and not "Defense" forces, since genocidal occupation is just about the furthest thing from defense.


I’ll always remember the turn around phrase that was a Yankee Doodle dandy moment “Obamacare because Obama cares”

It’s not a war machine, it’s a pork processing system for Congress.



That's for Charlie Kirk et al, not Jesse Singal.


For a certain definitions of faster


Are you suggesting K8S is free of leaky abstractions?


I'm suggesting for this case it's closer to ground truth than a hand rolled Vercel clone, because it's been battle tested and tweaked HEAVILY.


Containers on top of K8S is radically less ground truthy than this project, and you say heavily tweaked like it’s a good thing. I doubt there is a single person alive who understands even half of all of those tweaks.


Man, freebsd is just so clean and sensible by comparison to linux these days:

https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?hier


Looks nearly exactly the same as Linux to me...


It really is, as a frequent Linux user I was blown away the first time I tried it out.

Its just so sensible, when Linux is constantly dealing with utter brainrot like this OP fiasco


you are lying; this did not happen.


Solaris had a variety of M:N options in the early-to-mid 90s, including libthread and pthreads, all of which were precursors to GCD as you say.


I remember that the idea was to provide kernel-level support for better non-blocking I/O for M:N schedulers. I don't remember the details.


it's not clear that the solution to this problem is to create several additional layers of barn doors.


That doesn’t make sense: it’s like arguing that it wasn’t useful to have boat design switch to compartmentalization in addition to trying to avoid hitting things. You can spend a lot of effort trying to ensure bad code never arrives but unless that’s perfect you also want to think about how to make it less catastrophic.


the proposed idea does not reduce the attack surface or make anything easier or less catastrophic.


You might want to reread more carefully. Using the OS security features to restrict what the code you just installed can do prevents immediate attacks and gives you a chance to notice suspicious activity. If the only way to read a file is for the package to request permission and a scope, that gives you a chance to notice it (huh, why does tiny-color need ~/.GitHub?) and also serves as a triage cue for scanning pipelines to flag updates, especially minor ones, which increase the scope of the requested permissions.

Using OS features to restrict access to sensitive data similarly gives you another chance to detect a compromise because a denied operation to, say, read your wallet by an app which doesn’t need to is both highly visible and unambiguous.


I can read, thank you. The specific problems are that your 'prevent immediate attacks' and 'gives you a chance' are both doing significantly more work than you'd like to admit. A large project can use hundreds of npm packages, with the total dependency tree in the thousands. Your choices are to either give them infinite dialog fatigue on every single npm update, or make security-weakening tradeoffs. And if you ever let any of the packages create a new window and draw to it, that's game over. Even without malicious dialogs, users will continue to make bad choices, and 99.9% of all non-developer users and 99.8% of all developer users will accept or even broaden insecure defaults when prompted.

The problem is coming from inside the house.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: