> the model logic is fatally flawed, which is evidenced by its poor forecasting performance.
Where's the proof the model is flawed? The criticism goes both ways, if on one side the model does not have documentation, it's also fair to say that if someone claims it's "fatally flawed" they need to point out in the code where the issues are.
Where's the proof the model is flawed? The criticism goes both ways, if on one side the model does not have documentation, it's also fair to say that if someone claims it's "fatally flawed" they need to point out in the code where the issues are.