Bridges are designed, built, tested, and verified as fit for purpose.
Planes are designed, built, tested, and verified as fit for purpose.
Why should software models that inform policy be excluded from those requirements?
What is the expected cost of failure - it seems that critical risk controls are
missing from academia - in the case that they are wrong.
The case in hand - is problematic because it highlights that lack of controls that are
present and that should probably be present when building models and simulations
to inform policies.
Quality control is important in nearly every other industry - the lack of quality
controls in academia appears to be the root cause to me. Rather than particular
language/build choices.
The case in hand - is problematic because it highlights that lack of controls that are present and that should probably be present when building models and simulations to inform policies.
Quality control is important in nearly every other industry - the lack of quality controls in academia appears to be the root cause to me. Rather than particular language/build choices.