> Nevada, which has historically been a business friendly state with fair and balanced regulatory policies
Make no mistake: Jurisdictions that are "business friendly" are generally unfriendly to human dignity, social welfare, and individual rights. (By individuals, I mean real, human people, not the collective-delusional anthropomorphization of power structures maintained through the separate delusion of the ownership of resources, à la Citizens United's proposition that corporations are people too.)
And jurisdictions that are "business friendly" certainly don't have "fair and balanced regulatory policies": if they did, they wouldn't be business friendly — they'd be neutral.
It seems that the article's definition of predictability is we always win; and that is certainly not the hallmark of a properly functioning judicial system.
Make no mistake: Jurisdictions that are "business friendly" are generally unfriendly to human dignity, social welfare, and individual rights. (By individuals, I mean real, human people, not the collective-delusional anthropomorphization of power structures maintained through the separate delusion of the ownership of resources, à la Citizens United's proposition that corporations are people too.)
And jurisdictions that are "business friendly" certainly don't have "fair and balanced regulatory policies": if they did, they wouldn't be business friendly — they'd be neutral.
It seems that the article's definition of predictability is we always win; and that is certainly not the hallmark of a properly functioning judicial system.