Somehow, the writer of the editorial differentiates between "Capital" and "Talent", where one member of "Talen" is the CEO.

I think this is ridiculous. Certainly some CEOs are driven by forces beyond their comprehension or control, but for the most part, the CEOs are "Capital".

Further the write of the article imbues "Capital" with the emotion of anger.

I believe we have to consider this article and its analysis as rubbish.

Capital, talent... blah.

This was a pure union busting move on the part of the NFL.

Again proving that unions are a necessary evil.