Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Fwiw, JPEG XL takes around 2.5x the time to decode as an equivalent AVIF, and has worse compression https://jakearchibald.com/2025/present-and-future-of-progres...


Interesting, looks like another opportunity for Chrome to avoid the Safari mistake

> slow. There's some suggestion that the Apple implementation is running on a single core, so maybe there's room for improvement.

Though their own old attempt was even worse

> of the old behind-a-flag Chromium JPEG XL decoder, and it's over 500% slower (6x) to decode than AVIF.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: