Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The concern - for you, maybe nothing. However, the new company could say "turn on microphone for all vacuums in the DC area and send transcripts to us" (trying to capture private conversations of politicians. Or it could do the same for vacuums located new military bases or corporate headquarters. With transcription software and AI, it could simply record and transcribe every conversation it hears and look for important information or mentions of key phrases.




> However, the new company could say "turn on microphone for all vacuums in the DC area and send transcripts to us"

The old company could have done the same thing. I recognize that China is a u.s. geopolitical adversary, but when it comes to politics domestic adversaries are just as ruthless.


The old company wasn't a domestic political adversary; it was a capitalist corporation.

I'm not making moral comparisons; I'm just saying that the motivations of the PRRC and Coca-Cola are different.


> The old company wasn't a domestic political adversary

That depends entirely on the politics in question. It's well known that corporations are willing to abuse their power for political ends if it serves their interests to do so.


It was a capitalist corporation beholden to demands by domestic law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

And just because a corporation is based in China doesn’t automatically make it some kind of government managed communist entity.


If you live in the US, it is better for you if the home robots with microphones are controlled by the US than the US' geopolitical rival.

Can you expand on why that’s the case?

Suppose the Chinese gov has access to my robovac data. Given that I reside in the US, how is that worse than ICE having access to my data?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: